Skip to content
So What Makes a National Park a National Park? So What Makes a National Park a National Park?

So What Makes a National Park a National Park?

We called it a "bachelor party" because my buddy Israel was getting married, but Israel, Joel, and I are not traditional "bachelor party" people. Yes, we went to Key West. But instead of being hungover from piña coladas while incessantly listening to Jimmy Buffet (RIP), our version involved a ferry from Key West to Dry Tortugas National Park.

The Dry Tortugas are seventy miles west of Key West. The primary way most visitors get there is with Yankee Freedom ferry, which takes roughly two and a quarter hours each way and deposits you at a dock beside Fort Jefferson. The fort was begun in 1847, but it was never finished and never fired a shot in combat. Instead, most of its useful life was serving as a military prison. The cells are still there (you can walk into them).

The first hour follows a pattern I've heard from enough visitors to call it universal. Awe at the fortress, which is genuinely improbable: an enormous brick structure sitting in shallow turquoise water sixty miles from anywhere. Then the snorkeling, which is legitimately excellent, nurse sharks and parrotfish moving through coral in water clear enough to read through. And then, somewhere within the first hour, we had seen most of what there was to see on land, and the ending scene from Finding Nemo came to mind in which the aquarium fish are in plastic bags in Sydney Harbor.

We did it... now what?

In our case, it was more like a confusion about categorization than it was strictly a verdict about how cool the place was. We carry a mental image of what a national park looks like, assembled from Ansel Adams photographs and Ken Burns documentaries and the visual grammar of Half Dome and Old Faithful. Against that template, Dry Tortugas produces a kind of cognitive dissonance. No dramatic overlook. Not even any hiking trails. Just a fort, a reef, and lots of open water. 

Which raises a question worth actually answering: what makes something a national park, and how is that different from all the other ways the government designates and protects land?

 

National Parks

The national park designation is the hardest to earn. It requires an act of Congress, which means lawmakers had to affirmatively decide the place deserves permanent federal protection. There are 63 of them. Boundaries can only be changed by another act of Congress. The designation, once granted, is about as durable as anything in American public policy gets.

Dry Tortugas became a national park in 1992. Before that, for nearly sixty years, it was a national monument.

 

National Monuments

The Antiquities Act of 1906, signed by Theodore Roosevelt, gives the president authority to designate national monuments by executive order, without waiting for Congress. Roosevelt used it immediately and aggressively, protecting sites he worried wouldn't survive a slower process. It's a powerful tool precisely because it's fast.

The tradeoff is durability. Executive orders can be reversed by subsequent executive orders in a way that congressional legislation cannot (though it's worth mentioning that this is rare). For Dry Tortugas, the 1992 elevation to national park status meant stronger legal footing, stricter environmental protections, and a designation that isn't prone to jeopardy with a new administration.

 

National Forests and BLM Land

These are where a lot of people's mental map of public land gets fuzzy. National forests, managed by the US Forest Service, cover around 193M acres, but they operate under a multiple-use mandate. Logging, grazing & mining are all permitted alongside recreation. You can both hike in a national forest and a timber company can operate in the same forest. 

Bureau of Land Management land, another 245M acres mostly in the American West, operate even more permissively. BLM land is public and often spectacular, but it carries the least protection of any federal designation. When you hear debates about drilling or mining on public land, it's usually US forest service or BLM land that's being discussed. 

 

State Parks

State parks exist entirely outside the overarching federal system and are instead funded & managed by individual states. A state park in California operates under different rules than one in Wyoming, and neither is bound by federal law. Worth keeping in mind the next time someone uses state park and national park as if they mean the same thing. By the way, fun fact – there is one park that is jointly operated by both a state government and the National Park Service (Redwoods National & State Park in Northern California). 

---

The taxonomy of protected lands determines what can happen to a place, who has authority over it, and how hard it would be to undo its protection. A national monument can be reduced by the next president. A national forest can be logged. A national park requires Congress to change.

For a coral reef seventy miles from shore with no roads and no permanent population and no economic constituency beyond researchers and ferry passengers, that distinction is meaningful. Not a guarantee against every threat, the ocean doesn't care what Congress decided in 1992, but a meaningful layer of protection against the ones humans can actually control.

The last ferry back to Key West leaves at 2:45 in the afternoon. We made it with plenty of time to spare. On the trip back, the fort receded until it looked like a toy abandoned in the ocean. People started ordering margarita's and Pina coladas from the ferry's bar. Jimmy Buffet songs were playing in the background. I watched the water and thought about how much legal architecture it had taken to keep that reef intact, and how little of it is visible from the surface.

Back to top